-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/civ/ - Civics
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 477 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Trump is an asshole Anonymous 16/11/19(Sat)20:41 No. 42 ID: 9b7110 [Reply]
42

File 147958446886.jpg - (0.97MB , 2244x2462 , /ta-lq.jpg )


10 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/05/06(Sat)03:12 No. 282 ID: 87f732

>>42
Still hoping to hear from you about >>43

I'm really curious.

How many individual anus pictures is this made of?


>>
Anonymous 17/09/07(Thu)09:38 No. 421 ID: a4d268

>>282
Well, if you want to get an exact total you'd have to wait, but if you want to get an estimate you can just start at an arbitrary point on the horizontal axis and count across, pick an arbitrary point on the vertical axis and count down (or up), then multiply the two numbers by each other. Do it a few times at different spots then average out the results. Won't be exact but it'll be in the same ballpark.

Hopefully you like looking at anuses.


>>
Anonymous 17/09/21(Thu)17:30 No. 428 ID: d50172

>>421
That could be a lot more work than you anticipate. Those are almost certainly not each of them a unique anus picture. Collage generators usually use any given image of a collection multiple times, can use them at different rotations, etc, to get the most optimal rendition.

I would need sophisticated image processing to find out the hard way, but the creator of the image might remember the settings they specified to their generator (and the size of their anus collection).

I am not particularly a fan of anuses, but I'm not particularly perturbed by them either. I feel pretty /eh/ about the anuses themselves, it's the chance to say "Donald Trump is _____ assholes!" and publish this image in an "editorial" somewhere with lax standards.




Oh boy it's an abortion post Anonymous 17/08/08(Tue)17:46 No. 404 ID: 4a4a92 [Reply]
404

File 15022071857.jpg - (11.76KB , 168x94 , hqdefault.jpg )

http://youtu.be/JifTBDjtF38 7:50

Effectively: "Not EVERYONE should kill inconvenient unborn humans, nor should NOBODY do it, I'm just saying it should be legal for people who DO want to. This makes me the "fair and balanced" middle ground (apparently)."

I thought this was just a horrible, stupid joke on that one Simpsons episode. Is this how abortionists actually think?


sidetopic: abolish the political party system


3 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/08/11(Fri)17:19 No. 412 ID: d46376
412

File 150246479246.gif - (568.73KB , 458x600 , tumblr_mnr07kPk2z1rndw8do1_500.gif )

>>405
>>407
>>411
Certain debates consist entirely of meta-debate about the nature of the debate.


>>
Anonymous 17/08/30(Wed)08:46 No. 418 ID: b4d0d2

>>>Is this how abortionists actually think?

What the fuck is an abortionist? Are there people out there who are PRO-Abortion? NO there are not.

ANTI-Abortion folks would like there to be so they can have a black and white debate about this but there can't be, because NO ONE WANTS AN ABORTION. They are not fun, they are not therapeutic, they are not healthy. All they do is stop an unwanted fetus from becoming an unwanted baby.

Someone mentioned personal responsibility somewhere. That would be VASTLY better situation then aborting a fetus. But too bad, stupid/religious/ non-responsible people have to fuck all the time.


>>
Anonymous 17/08/30(Wed)10:03 No. 419 ID: 439740
419

File 150408019721.jpg - (61.12KB , 640x565 , MittFuckingRomney.jpg )

>>418
Never forget the wealthy fuck all the time too. The difference is that they pay a doctor and institution to provide the abortion with enough compensation to prevent anyone from reporting it to the authorities.

The louder someone screams about how wrong abortion is, the more likely it is they're covering up a guilty conscience. Too bad that conscience won't stop them from doing it again.




Anonymous 17/06/25(Sun)16:40 No. 349 ID: f09001 [Reply]
349

File 149840163438.jpg - (22.61KB , 700x263 , CN_med_red.jpg )

The US has no Best Korea policy.


5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/08/11(Fri)11:30 No. 409 ID: baccfb
409

File 150244382384.jpg - (146.51KB , 750x1095 , Trumpcare.jpg )

>>408
To be fair, Kim Jong Tiny Penis can't launch anything heavier than a conventional warhead further away than Japan right now, and he hasn't made sufficient fun of Trump's tiny hands, tiny crowds, tiny approval rating, tiny Russian bribes, etc., etc. to elicit that kind of response from Trump.

Then again, even if he did, Trump's handlers wouldn't let him see it. Fox & Friends does a good job of filtering out anything they don't want him to see, and all anyone else has to do is not include his name in every other paragraph for Trump to stop reading his national security briefings.


>>
Anonymous 17/08/12(Sat)02:18 No. 413 ID: d46376
413

File 150249711565.png - (761.38KB , 1920x1080 , Screenshot from 2017-08-12 09-16-20.png )

>>409
Everyone puts themselves in the middle of their own map.

Best Korea puts itself on the top of the world.

That's pretty juche.


>>
Anonymous 17/08/13(Sun)04:39 No. 414 ID: baccfb
414

File 150259199183.jpg - (71.82KB , 750x750 , Alternative Dog.jpg )

>>413
Everyone doesn't need to see their name in the middle of an article every other sentence in order to keep reading the article.

The only reason he even watches Fox & Friends is because they keep mentioning him.




Anonymous 17/07/19(Wed)15:19 No. 374 ID: 7f631b [Reply]
374

File 150047037466.png - (217.20KB , 1920x1080 , Screenshot from 2017-07-19 22-11-55.png )

The long game:

The right casts a shadow of treason, and bolsters the frightful spectre of Russia the left pans them for it, makes them look weak, divided, they falter; the American people--and finally the president himself--slowly redefining what it means to "hack" by propagandizing that hacking someone's dirty laundry is an attempt to sway public opinion. At the same time the left is going to be polishing the image of Russia in the self-identifying intellectual leftist core of loyal viewers as well as the channel-surfing general populace with a granule of curiosity about the outside word; helping people come to terms with Russia as a "peer" nation.

No one isn't colluding.


4 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/08/04(Fri)02:08 No. 400 ID: a870df

>>396
Rich Higgins, is that you?


>>
Anonymous 17/08/10(Thu)09:00 No. 406 ID: a2793e
406

File 150234843351.gif - (875.83KB , 566x290 , Screenshot from 2017-08-10 15-50-54 - 1-sm.gif )

>>400


>>
Anonymous 17/08/11(Fri)11:38 No. 410 ID: baccfb
410

File 150244431096.jpg - (62.16KB , 660x371 , Never4get.jpg )

>>406
Olgino native, there is more than one person in the United States called Rich.

You should probably update your wiki with this information.




Anonymous 17/06/20(Tue)02:16 No. 340 ID: 53a76e [Reply]
340

File 149791779974.jpg - (91.67KB , 600x600 , related_donald-trump_gd_160224.jpg )

Has anyone else noticed that people are becoming generally more belligerent and less concerned with reality outside their point of view?

It seems to me like more and more I hear comments that sound like his tweets; get into arguments against opinions based on nothing more than hearsay; etc.


24 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/08/02(Wed)06:34 No. 397 ID: 73f57f

>The meeting was about Russian adoptions
>But anyone else would have done the same
Anybody else would have had a meeting about Russian adoptions? What's so bad about having a meeting about Russian adoptions? Trump logic...


>>
Anonymous 17/08/02(Wed)17:40 No. 398 ID: 42625c

>>397
uh... yeah.. i guess....

In this thread, we are discussing the growing belligerency of statements people make and whether or not that is relevant to the rise of Donald Duck.


>>
Anonymous 17/08/03(Thu)07:18 No. 399 ID: d9030c
399

File 150173753839.png - (599.84KB , 600x511 , Fraud.png )

>>395
I find the suggestion
>you could argue our own election system fucked us
objectionable, in that there's no doubt that two times in 16 years the system perverted the clear intention of the voting public.




Anonymous 17/05/13(Sat)09:31 No. 302 ID: e7513d [Reply]
302

File 149466071781.jpg - (892.64KB , 2510x2510 , Gardening.jpg )

I think people have been going down the wrong track when it comes to Trump threatening Comey. They're missing the obvious.

Trump spends his life surrounded by conspiracy theorists. They funnel every stupid idea posted on the internet 24/7 to keep him in a perpetually agitated, distracted state. This is a man who think global warming is a conspiracy created by China, that fluoride is a form of mind control, that jet contrails contain biological agents, that vaccines cause autism... it's really not much of a stretch for him to think people are recording his every move every single day.

Given this I find it highly unlikely that Trump was threatening Comey because Trump had recorded conversations. Instead he was threatening Comey because he thought Comey had recorded their conversations.

The threat wasn't about Trump going to the press with a recording. Its a threat against Comey going to the press with recordings of what Trump said.


11 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/05/28(Sun)10:51 No. 315 ID: fb5950

>>314
Its not their fault. They're just a wee baby.


>>
Anonymous 17/07/21(Fri)08:49 No. 378 ID: 4d2f3c
378

File 150061974147.png - (180.25KB , 7680x4320 , flag_the_good_german_5e.png )

Could you morons stop talking the trump. Gee, I hope the left is right and he will start ww3 soon. CNNt take it anymore.


>>
Anonymous 17/07/21(Fri)12:40 No. 381 ID: 3b265d
381

File 150063365366.jpg - (73.65KB , 540x540 , Sad.jpg )

>>378
Your self constructed bunker will be your grave.




Anonymous 17/06/11(Sun)08:35 No. 328 ID: 7fa261 [Reply]
328

File 149716294898.png - (207.08KB , 908x900 , Marshall_Plan_svg.png )

In four years, at an adjusted cost of just $130 billion, the US prevented war-devastated Europe from becoming a shithole for another half-century.


15 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/07/18(Tue)05:19 No. 372 ID: 73f57f

>>369
And take more than they gave they did. I'm not disputing that. What I'm asking is, what better propaganda for the motherland if not showing off to the world its ability to not just prop up, but to make its satellites PROSPEROUS. What country wouldn't want to be in its good graces and under its wing? If the USSR had had the ability to do such a thing, the way America did, they probably would have. The exploitation they engaged in, as I see it, is in part A RESULT of their inability to compete with America. America didn't have any need for such behavior. So why would we engage in it? We stood nothing to gain from raping Western Europe. So why would we do that? You might say that, given how war-ravaged it was, there was nothing to take to begin with. But Eastern and Western Europe were equally war-torn. And yet the USSR still found something to pillage. The point is, we could have done the same, but we didn't need to. Helping Western Europe instead made us look infinitely better than the USSR on the world stage. I'm not saying that it was a purely cynical move. I am saying that it was only possible for us to do because we had the means, and that therefore it was a no-brainer. Any great power whose power was great enough to grant it the ability to do such an ostensibly benevolent thing would have done the same. We happened to be the only one that could.


>>
Anonymous 17/07/18(Tue)09:04 No. 373 ID: e9f020

>>372
You could be right. Particularly about this:
>The exploitation they engaged in, as I see it, is in part A RESULT of their inability to compete with America
That's likely. It would have been great for them to have prosperous nations along their border, but they probably couldn't have sustained them--let alone the USSR itself. It was certainly more cost effective to strip their remaining resources, though not as profitable.
and this:
>You might say that, given how war-ravaged it was, there was nothing to take to begin with
Don't be too quick to put anything past the United States. We've done a good deal more than our fair share if international dickery, but only when the profits from doing so significantly overcame the costs. The USSR was willing to accept a thinner profit margin for immediate gains; we wanted countries that would depend on trade with us and be able to give us loans in the future.

It does seem very much like both sides took advantage of the opportunities they had to the fullest capacity they were able.

Why isn't anyone thinking like this in our Middle Eastern wars? Both sides keep swapping incompetency and half-measures while the situation only gets worse and the staggering costs continue to skyrocket.


>>
Anonymous 17/07/21(Fri)12:37 No. 380 ID: 3b265d

>>373
Look on the bright side. Now that Russia has openly started killing citizens of the middle east, now they're going to discover what actual terrorism looks like, instead of just Putin's false flags.

They might even discover that their own citizens become disillusioned with being a perpetual underclass and start joining in.




Anonymous 17/07/05(Wed)19:33 No. 359 ID: e339bd [Reply]
359

File 149927602396.png - (81.63KB , 603x332 , We.png )

"A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people"

"He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers"




Anonymous 17/06/25(Sun)18:44 No. 350 ID: 88cae6 [Reply]
350

File 14984090535.png - (467.90KB , 1920x1080 , Screenshot from 2017-06-26 01-43-54.png )

Ok, go home!


>>
Anonymous 17/06/25(Sun)18:45 No. 351 ID: 88cae6
351

File 14984091301.png - (597.35KB , 1920x1080 , Screenshot from 2017-06-26 01-43-57.png )

Listen, Ishmael, you're going to be charged with possession of a concealed firearm.




Anonymous 17/06/02(Fri)08:44 No. 319 ID: 374426 [Reply]
319

File 149638589337.jpg - (68.84KB , 557x612 , Hillary25.jpg )

The Democratic Party will run Hillary again in 2020.

There's no other explanation for their continued efforts to keep her in the limelight.

This is quite possibly the stupidest thing they could ever do to themselves and I cannot comprehend why they would persue such an obviously futile goal as putting Hillary Clinton in power.


6 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/06/09(Fri)06:10 No. 326 ID: 46cd65

>>324
>>325
Now we're getting into the actual geographical and cultural divides that the political disagreements seem to follow.

Incidentally, if you need more arguments for state, county, and municipal rights, imagine what those assholes in the places you don't live will do when they pass laws that have no relevance to your own life and in fact make it more difficult.


>>
Anonymous 17/06/09(Fri)08:40 No. 327 ID: 6aad31
327

File 149699042667.jpg - (600.71KB , 600x486 , Religion.jpg )

>>326
>imagine what those assholes in the places you don't live will do when they ... have no relevance to your own life and in fact make it more difficult
Which is Trump and the GOP in a nutshell.

Assholes in far away places with no grasp of anything approaching a modern society making everyone's lives more difficult because they think coal mining is going to take off or unskilled labor factory jobs are going to surge and a billion other fantasies that never will happen no matter who the fuck you elect.

Rather than adapt to the modern world they want to force everyone to return to the dark ages because they distrust anyone with an IQ over 40 who talks to them like a goddamn adult.


>>
Anonymous 17/06/17(Sat)03:19 No. 337 ID: a870df
337

File 149766238417.jpg - (69.43KB , 1024x546 , Pretend.jpg )

>>326
We've already got that.

When local government passes laws that a GOP state government doesn't like, they write laws that invalidate the local ordinances. When state governments pass laws that the GOP federal government doesn't like, they try to write laws that invalidate state ordinances.

The GOP is only about local & state rights when they're some kneejerk topic the GOP agrees with. If you write something that's the opposite of their kneejerk then all local & state rights can go right the fuck out the window.

You will march in lockstep with your wealthy master race or they'll remove your voting rights.




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason