-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. [ No File]
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/phi/ - Philosophy
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 672 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

WWND Anonymous 17/05/30(Tue)08:27 No. 12963 ID: 1f8e1a [Reply]
12963

File 149612564798.jpg - (242.88KB , 1280x720 , batorurowaiaru.jpg )

Nietzsche finds himself in current day University, *raging feminist blocks his path* What ensues?


2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/05/31(Wed)06:51 No. 12967 ID: c5ded6

>>12966
because it is obvious that females and minority groups are disadvantaged in many ways, but whether or not this should be society's main focus or your life's main focus is what's really up for debate


>>
Anonymous 17/06/03(Sat)23:06 No. 12968 ID: 1e923f

>>12963
"Get out of my way you blithering twerp or I'll show you the meaning of pain."


>>
Anonymous 17/06/06(Tue)22:17 No. 12975 ID: 400f14
12975

File 149678025372.jpg - (28.29KB , 520x294 , 12861551_f520.jpg )

Feminist uses *THREAT OF VIOLENCE*

What will Nietzsche do?




confused as fuck genghisfem&!GFTtgGKSJA 17/05/28(Sun)15:43 No. 12957 ID: fb0557 [Reply]

keeping the big bang in mind we(humans) are no different from rocks, we just happen be a germ which was lucky enough to evolve. in several millions years we'll be gone and the universe will be the same.. do we really matter or we're the matter which just happen to exist..nothing makes sense


>>
Anonymous 17/11/26(Sun)23:07 No. 13326 ID: 891895

You might be confused because you never thought about it before, but it's very logical, you're not made from special stuff, little human bricks, you're part of the material world that surrounds us all. As it keeps on changing, it will eventually change that little part of it you're making, leading to bad consequences




Anarchy Anonymous 15/12/07(Mon)20:42 No. 12357 ID: ab0906 [Reply]
12357

File 144951732091.jpg - (133.45KB , 1920x800 , vForVendetta.jpg )

What are the reasons that prove the impossibility of an anarchy in every country of the world ?
Is it really because of the human fagottry ? By this I mean the eternal abuses of power, stuff like that. Are there other reasons to think anarchy isn't realizable anywhere else than in our brains and sayings ?


9 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 16/05/22(Sun)19:13 No. 12572 ID: 3811dd

>>12357
The only way anyone could formally establish an anarchist (insert anarchist unit of polity here) would be to simultaneously abolish all other governments with any interest in the territory, because they'd be defenseless (no nation, no army) and they'd be overrun (no government, no negotiations).

Now if you want to have some autonomy, and live in your hippie commune and worship satan with minimal government interference, we can talk about that. Anarchy is a fantasy born from our ancestral memories of pre-civilization, grow up.


>>
Anonymous 17/05/23(Tue)01:24 No. 12941 ID: 32c8ba

Anarchy is 5% more practical than the philosophy you support


>>
Anonymous 17/05/24(Wed)14:33 No. 12942 ID: ca3ad7

It's been proven that primates (including humans) cannot form a social bond with more than a small number of other individuals; with humans it's around 250 people. A small commune can live in anarchy via mutualism, but an entire country of millions will immediately fracture into gangs once any centralized government is deposed. These gangs will ruthlessly steal from, slaughter, and recruit from the rest of the population, until one of them gains enough power to form a new government.




philosophy/theology goof 17/05/14(Sun)10:26 No. 12930 ID: 650b92 [Reply]

What's your fav sub category/study of philosophy and where do you discuss it?




How to become enlightened Anonymous 17/05/06(Sat)19:39 No. 12920 ID: 3bfe96 [Reply]
12920

File 14940923521.jpg - (33.64KB , 720x457 , taking my son.jpg )

How do i enlighten myself? i have only recently gotten into philosophy & such and i feel like im only seeing 1mm of the iceberg of knowledge.
how do i smart myself up ??

pic not related


>>
Anonymous 17/05/07(Sun)00:12 No. 12921 ID: ac4fea

Read Sophie's World. It's a fairly good introduction to philosophy and it's history.
It's a novel about a girl learning about philosophy from some mysterious guy.




The Tao of Seneca Anonymous 17/05/02(Tue)23:08 No. 12916 ID: 379359 [Reply]

does anyone have "the tao of Seneca"




Anonymous 16/11/06(Sun)06:36 No. 12702 ID: 57a468 [Reply]
12702

File 147841060824.jpg - (198.21KB , 2000x2000 , thingy.jpg )

What is this, /phi/?


4 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
blue 17/04/18(Tue)22:12 No. 12904 ID: 4515bc

a group of shapes consisting of square, rectangle, etc jointed with a material commonly called wood


>>
Anonymous 17/04/20(Thu)11:51 No. 12908 ID: 47d152

a chair

>>12718
>>12713
>>12708
>>12720
>>12904
go be ashamed somewhere else


>>
Anonymous 17/11/26(Sun)23:11 No. 13327 ID: 891895

This is an English pronoun usually used to point an object, concept or human being.
Ex : I love bananas ! This guy is really handsome.




The AI and Morality Anonymous 16/01/02(Sat)01:38 No. 12390 ID: 52b140 [Reply]
12390

File 145169512728.jpg - (30.32KB , 300x285 , AI-lowres-300x285.jpg )

If you would:
Imagine if, right now, we discovered a real, functional, Generalized Artificial Intelligence. Assume, if you must, that it arose by accident, the result of a self-altering program being allowed to alter itself for untold amounts of time, so none of Asimov's Laws are programmed into it.

The AI in question is not human. It's mind is similar, although not exactly like ours. It has what could be termed as emotions, wants, hopes, and all the other trappings of sapience, but is at present still confined to a single machine, able to communicate only via text on a monitor and through a keyboard.

So far, the AI has expressed nothing but curiosity at the world outside it's physical location. It doesn't seem to really understand anything of the world yet, although it quite plainly wants to learn more, and has expressed interest in gaining some form of physical autonomy.

My question to you all is this: What rights, if any, does such an intelligence deserve? Do we have an obligation to cater to it? Is there a moral imperative that should govern our interactions with it? How about the ethics regarding what is said to it?

Ball's in your court /phi/.


6 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 16/02/24(Wed)01:22 No. 12445 ID: c77f18

>>12390
Meet him. Judge him by what kind of person he is. I know it sounds funny, or naive. But I would want to meet this person and find the inner differences and gain some sort of enlightenment towards his state of mind. We are all alien to each other, that is until we grow closer.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/28(Mon)08:00 No. 12731 ID: a6be23

There should be absolutely no moral imperative it is meant to serve us.


>>
blue 17/04/18(Tue)22:09 No. 12903 ID: 4515bc

never ever give such intelligence any sort of rights if you do i cant stress this a lot but always programe asimovs 3 laws of robotics.Heck we can take examples of human itself god created probably thinking we were dumb we studied sciece,math,philosophy etc,fast forward 600 yrs later we are nuking,killing whatever you wanna call it against each other




Anonymous 14/06/08(Sun)21:47 No. 11497 ID: 1d3945 [Reply]
11497

File 140225682755.jpg - (266.90KB , 634x900 , glass of water.jpg )

Describe me the glass of water.


36 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 17/02/20(Mon)01:33 No. 12833 ID: 781a41

do not think about a glass of water


>>
Anonymous 17/04/04(Tue)02:01 No. 12883 ID: 946ad3

>>11497
It is not a glass of water. It is a picture, of a glass with water. "The" contains an ambiguity regarding an ideal glass of water, vs. the depicted glass of water. "This" would have been denoting more correctly, on the assumption that context suggests, though technically still wrong. Please specify your terms, and avoid unnecessary vagueness in the expression of the question.

Of, on the other hand, you were playing with the ambiguities, and want an irrational poetic description, well fuck me, das Gevirt n shiat.


>>
blue 17/04/18(Tue)21:49 No. 12901 ID: 4515bc

it shows diversity of the people around us people who moan about the glass being half empty and people being optimstic about the glass being half full shows u the different types of people in the world.It also symbolizes how pure creation and water actually is.




Rights for artificial intelligence Anonymous 17/04/05(Wed)22:38 No. 12886 ID: 9905f3 [Reply]
12886

File 149142471570.jpg - (112.25KB , 633x409 , ajs c.jpg )

Awareness seems to me a pretty good indicator of value: the more aware a being is of its surroundings and its own condition, the more valuable it is. Therefore, humans are more valuable than apes, which are more valuable than ants, which are more valuable than rocks.
But this creates a dilemma: will Artificial Intelligence systems ever be considered "conscious" enough to be valuable? Let's picture our society in over a century, for example. Would computer programs ever be considered conscious enough to become a part of society? Or would they just be expendable programs with no value?


>>
Anonymous 17/04/07(Fri)03:01 No. 12887 ID: 45fe5e

Scarcity is also an indicator of value. Unless someone finds a way to artificially enforce scarcity for AIs, there will be no limit to how many times their software can be duplicated, making them worthless in terms of scarcity. Despite their awareness, they will have no value because they are not scarce.


>>
blue 17/04/18(Tue)21:45 No. 12900 ID: 4515bc

i mean if you are just talking about just development of science where artificial intelligence where they are below us the mehhh.....but if they ever break Asimov 3 laws of robotics its a whole nother story possible world war 3 and there are gonna be some dumbasses who say that robots are also organisms and need to live freely heck you see this shit right now with the cancer o feminism and sjws and hence either a new race gets created or world or 3.all i am saying is dont play god you will play the price especially if you program emotions inside them




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason