You're all a bunch of pedo nonces.

File 13859240401.jpg - (85.84KB , 500x379 , 1349388710033.jpg )

>>7831
I wish I could hold all these edges but I cannot.
Congrats.

>>7730
My first thought when I saw the board was missing. I don't understand why that was allowed, and STICKIED nonetheless. The loli/ss boards explicitly banned things like that.

From what I saw, the stories were really just bullshit and bragging about how anon fucked their classmate when they were 10, but that thread was begging for trouble.

But now that I hear it was the Russian government...I'm wondering if the board really could have avoided the deletion if we banned the "real shota" stories.

I just want muh shota back

>>7839
Everyone wants to, everyone.

So, it's December, and nothing has changed.

It's been over two weeks since /cake and /h were supposedly about to be purged like /sm was because the host demanded it. Nothing has changed.


When are you going to stop lying to us, guys? Couldn't you just admit that you simply don't LIKE gay shotacon (and bestiality, and whatever else you get rid of) and that's the only reason why it's gone? It's okay; you own the damn board, so do what you please. Just cut the bullshit, already.


>I'm wondering if the board really could have avoided the deletion if we banned the "real shota" stories.

Photographs and non-real "pictures" are one thing, but there is no modern country on Earth than has criminalized or banned the written word, in any form. The Diary of Anne Frank includes a bit where she sexually experiments with her cousin; the stuff on /sm was no different from that except in detail (and being mostly false).

File 138644676277.jpg - (151.55KB , 800x800 , 138176720360.jpg )

It's my shota and I want it now

>>7849
/sm/ only got removed once our hosts got the email from the Ruskies. Thus far that doesn't seemed to have happened for /cake/ and /h/, or if they have, they haven't yet acted on it.

And for the record, I'm not going to remove a board because of personal reasons. Why would I willingly take away traffic from the site? I don't enjoy anime, but you don't see me getting rid of /a/.

Also status update. I have the new server, I'm going to work on setting it up over this weekend.

thanx for ur effort to get /sm back up and running. cant wait to see it!

File 138656728694.png - (470.99KB , 625x426 , 1386554171261.png )

THANK YOU I LOVE!!!!!

Where can someone find more Shota?

>>7856
Not in Russia, apparently.

Hey guys,

The server move is complete, and as promised, /sm/ is restored.

Thanks for all you hard work!

File 138724210747.jpg - (164.84KB , 1500x1500 , 4.jpg )

Now this awesome corner of the internet is complete.

>>7866
You're awesome, Saz.

Thanks. I love you.

>>7866

cool

-anon

it was really nice to see the webpage back up and running again. thanx again for ur work and promises kept.

Whoa, this is unexpected. I didn't expect to see /sm/ again. Thank you so much!
(if we could have /be/ back as well, that would be great)

>>7877
I'm still figuring out what to do about /be/. The main problem is figuring out where to draw the line between animal abuse and zoophilia. The case can be made that all zoophilia is animal abuse. You can also specifically call different acts abuse. It's very hard to draw a line that pleases enough people to make the board popular enough to keep around, and also find moderators that can keep that line in place.

>>7878

I've seen lots of places where the line is drawn.

There's the feminist view: all men are rapists, so it's okay as long as there are no (human) males in there. I suspect this claim is actually created by straight men who only want to see women getting banged by dogs and horses because they're into humiliation.

There's the "passive only" stance. Basically, as long as the human is always the one getting penetrated or using their mouth/hand, it's okay. It boils down to: no men penetrating female or male animals (or, in theory, women using strap-ons or dildos, though I've never seen that). The reasoning behind this is that it's possible to hold down a dog and forcibly penetrate them, but it's not really possible to force a dog to mount you — he'll just jump off if he's not interested. However, this runs into trouble with "dildogging", which many claim is a form of abuse as it probably hurts the dog.

Ideally the best is disallowing anything where the animal is clearly in pain or struggling to escape, but that's not possible unless the moderator(s) personally check every video. The rule could be something like no non-sexual abuse: so no beating, forcing, whipping, snuff, that sort of deal. It would still rely on people to flag suspect videos for the moderators to check, and that still relies on people being civil and not being hypocritical fucktards about other people's fetishes.

You might be able to do something where animal/woman and animal/man is separated. In my experience, it's usually the people who like the former and don't like the latter who start shit. Considering the oversaturation with animal/woman in the genre to the exclusion of most everything else, you might be able to get away with making a couple stickies that the "gay" stuff has to stay in. Then the whiny straight men can just hide that thread and go about their business.


(Oh, and thanks for bringing back /sm, by the way. Forgive me for not trusting the word of politicians at face-value. You've gained my respect, for what it's worth.)

>>7879
>There's the "passive only" stance. Basically, as long as the human is always the one getting penetrated or using their mouth/hand, it's okay. It boils down to: no men penetrating female or male animals (or, in theory, women using strap-ons or dildos, though I've never seen that). The reasoning behind this is that it's possible to hold down a dog and forcibly penetrate them, but it's not really possible to force a dog to mount you — he'll just jump off if he's not interested. However, this runs into trouble with "dildogging", which many claim is a form of abuse as it probably hurts the dog.

I don't view /be/, not my thing, but this option sounds best. Alternatively you could say 'no humans allowed' and forbid anything with humans resulting in a board full of images of animals doing each other, getting themselves off and what-not. It's all shits and giggles to me.

>>7880
That's going to exclude a large amount of what was actually posted on /be/
>Ideally the best is disallowing anything where the animal is clearly in pain or struggling to escape, but that's not possible unless the moderator(s) personally check every video. The rule could be something like no non-sexual abuse: so no beating, forcing, whipping, snuff, that sort of deal. It would still rely on people to flag suspect videos for the moderators to check, and that still relies on people being civil and not being hypocritical fucktards about other people's fetishes.


This seems like the most reasonable option

>>7866

hero of the people

>>7880
Bestiality's not my thing, but this mentality of penetration being bad bothers me. I'm going to agree with >>7881

>>7866

Thank you!

Any luck with /be/?

>>7920
We have an open call for moderators before we launch it. I don't know if we have any volunteers yet. If you want to moderate /be/, contact Found on IRC or express interest with your email here.

>>7702
Da! Russian government ist genius!
...the kind of genius that works at the apple store for 8 bucks an hour.

+1 vote for the return of /be.
"the horror... the horror... the horror..."

>>7923
I would moderate /be/ so hard if I could dammit. I'm here like every day but I only have mobile internet... That makes it impossible right?

Come on some guy, mod that shit

File 139035909314.gif - (71.95KB , 457x509 , thank_you_052.gif )

That's really good Sazpaimon the internet thanks you for trying


>>7879

I never understood the point of having animal/women and animal/man, especially if you're trying to filter using penetration.

It should be more: male/human and female/human.

This always pissed me off people making huge zoo torrents sorted by "man" and "women", wtf are you doing mate I'm a zoo I'm looking for males and females here.

i've never been a mod, so i think i'll pass. i hope someone wil volunteer though.
i'm all yes for no animals penetrated by humans, if only that would help to revive /be/ faster...
are there any plans for mobile version of 7chan?

>>7931
>are there any plans for mobile version of 7chan?

Plans and concept images yes. Implentation seems to be a long way off.
See: >>6427

File 139062012410.png - (97.33KB , 310x170 , skeleton-computer-user_jpg_350x250_crop_q85.png )

>>7932
>last post from a few months ago
well, I guess I'll just wait here...

>>7879

Btw how is a mod even supposed to check videos when people post them on those impossible to use filesharing sites. Even as a user it was just fuck it not worth the effort.

>>7937
We don't.
Hence >>/s/14
>Download at your own risk. 99% of these are spam.
If someone calls out a post as being a virus or something similar, I always delete it. Like you said, it's not worth the effort.

>If someone calls out a post as being a virus or something similar, I always delete it.

In hindsight, that sounds like a very good way to let trolls — who don't like gay shit or don't like any of it — just run roughshod saying legit files have viruses when they don't. I understand that you can't check out only those that are flagged, because then the trolls will just continue doing so to waste your time, but still. There has to be a better way.

>>7941
That very rarely happens. The last time someone called out a virus was several months ago.
And as a way to prevent your post being deleted as spam, if I do fuck up, I encourage you to post some sort of message alongside it instead of just the download link. URL shorteners also throw up a big red flag for spam.

I can moderate /be/.

File 13916596749.jpg - (519.19KB , 640x960 , cute-puppy.jpg )

so, how's the progress?

File 139189219053.png - (16.28KB , 645x773 , sweet_dreams.png )

My dog, /be/ is back, this is beautiful.

>>7953
No. Not really.

What happened to the stories thread on /sm/?

>>8079

It died. Let me know if you find a replacement in the interwebz.

>>8081
Please no ;_;

And how could it die? It was pinned on the first page...

>>8082
>>8014

Da! Sandvich makes me strong!
POOTIS POOTIS POOTIS POOTIS POOTIS POOTIS POOTIS DISPENSER HERE

U guys keep mentioning that /sm/ is back, but that’s not true, I have never had it show up on here again. It’s still a 404 error page. What’s going on?

>>10818
/sm/ is back, just not on 7chan.