Has anyone ever found a good alternative to asstr that has a good amount of underage stories?

One that I read on asstr years ago and have been looking for again was a story about a woman and her shemale girlfriend who like to rape their son. He would run and hide and they enjoyed hunting him down and dragging him out of his hiding place. I don't remember much of the details but I do recall at the end they fantasize about killing him, but agree they'd rather keep him as a fuck toy.

>>25597
>>25709

>>25597
>>25709
>>8751
>>17366

I have lost stories I'm looking for?

Lost Story 1: Does anyone have Brendanruler8's story Revenge: BE Edition story? His DA account was deactivated.

Lost Story 2: Also, I vaguely remember this older story (early 2000s era?) where this girl was being held against her will in some secret factory somewhere. I can’t remember if it was BE or Body Inflation/fat but she was being fed something and slowly growing, filling a good part of the warehouse. They were using her to produce something so maybe it was BE with milk? Anyway some human rights activists sneak in to try to save her but accidentally turn the machine on full blast and she grows wayy bigger and possibly pops if IIRC?

Lost Story 3: There was a story about a couple, Lyle and Ginger. And I think Lyle ended up possessed and made Ginger rapidly gain weight until she exploded or something? I think she was self conscious about her weight or something.

Lost Story 4: Unnamed Planetary Inflation: All I have is story details, sadly- an alien woman turns her lover/bestie into a whole bloated planet, teeming with life and vegetation, for their race to live on and in. Travels inside her womb later, to fuck/inflate a clone of her. It was real trippy, but really cool too. Would love it if someone knew what I was talking about!

Lost Story 5: SaburoX used to have a writer that he worked with, who wrote stories about Fang Hua, his OC. The stories themselves have gone missing, as the user isn't on DA anymore, it seems. Any help finding these stories and possibly the author would be awesome.

Lost Story 6: Remember the one where the girl applied a bunch of cream to her body that caused all her fat to be redistributed to her boobs, then after one night of pigging out she gets immobilized?

Lost Story 7: The attached pic is the only part of a story I have, does anyone know it? It's a story where two women were in a model competition and one used this BE cream called "Bust-EZ" and her rival finds out?

I'm trying to find a story, pretty old.

A spoiled rich girl goes to a clothing store to buy things with her dad's money. She treats the shop assistants rudely. Unfortunately for her they're a pair of unscrupulous lesbians. They trick her (I think by invited her to see their pool or something) kidnap her, and have their way with her. She's subjected to a bunch of indignities. At one point she fucks a car gearstick.

I thought it was on asstr but I haven't been able to find it in the archive yet.

A sci-fi-ish story about a future where debt slavery is legal
A woman in her forties is auctioned because of unpaid debt, a young man buys her. She recognises him as her son from her first marriage and shows gratitude for manumiting her. He says that he has no intention of manumiting her and has bought her to serve as a sex slave. The reluctant mother eventually learns to be a good sex slave and bears her masters child

>>28095
Possibly you are looking for Adverse Conditioning by colt45 at Storiesonline.

I remember a story posted here years ago. Two sisters, different ages, both working to seduce the same older guy. They initially start off jealous of each other, but the final scene was a threesome where they decide to share him and realize they enjoy yuri as well. I don't think the guy and sisters were related, but I'm not positive. I think it was called "Lipstick", or something like that. Anybody remember this one?

>>28092

Bountiful Plantation by LCDRJMC

Does anyone have a full archive of Nicholas Fellheimer's stories? Wayback Machine helped with about half, but I'm still missing quite a few favorites

>>16434
did someone jnow where to find story 3 of this post?

I think there was a pic of a brunette reverse in cowgirl and that it was hosted on /in/ when it still existed

To not make you click the link just for that here is the text i m refering to

girl storyteller her brother comes into her bed at night because either too cold or storm dont remember reason but brother gets curious and feels up sister while she pretends to sleep he tries to put it in and she says something, brother gets scared but she says it alright decides to let him fuck her.

Nevemind got it on the waybackmachine

here it is in case someone wants

https://web.archive.org/web/20141011011947/https://8chan.co/in/res/23.html

By the way, it seems like ASSTR.org is back. Haven't tried uploads yet but if you lost track of stories that were there, at least it's an opportunity to find them again.

Desperately trying to find a story that I swear I read here years ago, but it was about a guy in an apartment who meets twin girls and he begins to basically babysit for them. Fairly quickly, though, he learns they have psychic abilities (one is telepathic, both are empathic to varying degrees) and he starts doing things with them. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me someone can direct me to it.

Desperately trying to find a story that I swear I read here years ago, but it was about a guy in an apartment who meets twin girls and he begins to basically babysit for them. Fairly quickly, though, he learns they have psychic abilities (one is telepathic, both are empathic to varying degrees) and he starts doing things with them. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me someone can direct me to it.

Twice the Fun

Had a hdd die and lost so much with it. Trying to find a story that I recall being titled "our story" It was about a three (or four, it's been years since I read it) siblings who ended up in a relationship together, one older brother and his younger sisters. One of the sister was an adopted asian girl iirc. I believe something happened with the parents and they ended up living in the house themselves until some lady (I forget what her relationship was with them originally) adopts them and then finds out the kids were in a relationship with each other.

I'm not left nor right, not conservative nor liberal, not trad not prog, and not Republican nor Democrat.

The Nazis reject me, so do the libertarians. My political views are a mixed bag of ideas from various political ideologies, with heavy modifications of my own made to them

My political views start out sounding libertarian, but take a turn that most libertarians wouldn't support, but that doesn't mean the natsocs or whitenats would be okay with me, either.

Start with a night watchman minarchist state (the people are not given any rights because they are by default free to do anything they want except break the laws, and the government is by default not allowed to do anything except what is strictly necessary to preserve itself from threats and to minimize the number of times when its laws are broken), the principle of nonaggression being the only laws (do not interact with the persons/bodies or property/belongings of others without having their informed voluntary and unrevoked consent to the interaction, additionally all eligible citizens must pay their taxes when they are due), and the georgian lvt (a percentage of the lands value being taken as a taxation, in exchange for the taxpayer being able to vote in elections, I'd also like to make front line service in the military or police or emergency response be a requirement for purchasing or holding land), and elections being held by a voting process I approve of (one that sees voters rank all candidates in order of preference on a ballot, being able to assign the same rank to multiple candidates, or to leave any candidate unranked, and then the count begins to find out who has the least first place rankings, and they will be removed from the running and stricken from all ballots, bumping up any candidates below them whenever their removal creates an empty space on the ballots rankings, and the process is repeated until only one candidate remains, who is crowned the winner).

But then wed ask the question who should be counted as a member of the people? To whom or to what should the NAP be applicable? And there I've decided that only those with at least one Y-chromosome in their DNA, low eumelanin levels in their skin, hair, and eyes, and are old enough to be capable of having biological children of their own should be considered human by the state/government and have the laws be applicable to them. White females in particular should be dejure outlawed and defacto enslaved, being reduced to chattel property to belong to white men (such as their fathers, brothers, sons, uncles, cousins, nephews, or other male relatives, until the ownership of them is transferred to another white man who becomes their new owners, aka their husbands). Also Democrat supporting white boys should spend their childhoods learning how to be warriors, as the most important jobs in any society have historically been the warrior caste of police and militia, violence is the most essential atomic element of all society and civilization.. Lastly I'd like to make an additional law that has a penal colony established somewhere only for those men who either have had sex with another male of any age or species (sex being defined as any act that may transmit diseases through bodily fluids such as saliva or sexual fluids), as sending the faggots away would cause them to come volunteer to be banished into exile rather than drive them deeper underground and having them hide out among us like a cancerous tumor waiting to spread. Also I'd like to have a royal family above the ministers who would hold veto power over anything they could do (but cannot initiate any action on their own). Kings and emperors are great and we wouldn't need to worry about queens.

When the 4chan hack occurred in 2025 and we discovered it was getting a majority of its posts from isreal ips beginning in 2014. Confirming the common claim that 4chans good /b/ years were the decade from 03 to 13. Now everyone using it is newfag cancer.

Here's some for you: a cogitation on ethics and morality.

- What makes something good or evil?
- For the majority of human history, morality came from the gods, what God was pleased by was good, what God was displeased by was evil.
- But why was that?
- Could it be because God had created everything?
- But how do we know he did that? What reason does that give us to consider him to be the best authority on what we are to do? Does it stand to reason that the creator of something is the best authority on how to use what they've made?
- the answer to those three questions are that we can't know if God actually made everything, and even have ample reason to believe he did not, that even if he did we would have no cause to consider him the ultimate authority just on his having created everything, and from history we've seen the most common use of things be far removed from the purpose intended by it's creators, also there's the logic that if creation = authority than children who are the product of their parents bodies would have to recognize their parents as their owners who may do as they please with them and to whom they must always be unfailingly obedient.
- Is it because God is the wisest?
- What is wisdom but the knowledge of good and evil? Isn't that a circular logic (that the one who best knows what is moral best knows what is moral because they are the one that best knows what is moral - or so they claim to)? And how can we know if God is actually the wisest being as he so claims? If we are to accept this than we must completely discard our own moral feelings entirely when reading the word of God and use the sacred texts (eg. The bible or the quaran) as the source of orders we must follow to the letter, without imposing our own interpretations or emotions upon what it tells us to do (look at the year of living biblically for an experiment in what this might be like - it takes an atheist to take religion seriously).
- So should we obey God because he says what is moral? Or should we obey God because morality is whatever he says?
- the classic eupythro dilemma, where both paths lead to interesting places.
- in the second solution, called the divine command principle, where whatever God says is moral because God said it and morality is absolute obedience to God, doing whatever is pleasing to him, and not doing what is displeasing to him, we again ask why this is.
- not because he is the creator, and not because he is the most wise, but because those who make God happy get rewarded with the greatest pleasure possible (Heaven) and those who make God unhappy get punished with the worst pain possible (Hell).
- So the authority here that serves as the standard of morality is not God per we, but instead the pleasure principle. We should do whatever gives us the greatest pleasure and the least pain.
- moving away from religious morality, we have the much more secular normative ethics like utilitarianism and deontology, but exploring the arguments made by their proponents we ultimately come to the same underlying principle of personal pleasure.
- for example, people arguing for freedom of speech saying that without it society would collapse, but why should that be relevant to ethics or morals or good and evil at all? Well because wouldn't you dislike it if society collapsed? Which is the admission of the pleasure principle being the true nature of all morals and ethics in the normative sphere.
- its worth noting that normative ethical systems were devised as a way of making people act in ways consistent with Christian religious morality without requiring them to believe in religious concepts like God or make any reference to them.
- also, to distinguish between the principle of personal pleasure from utilitarianism, the letter concerns itself with the pleasure of everyone it includes in the number it applies its ratios to, while the former is concerned only with the pleasure of oneself, they use the utilitarian ratio, but only applied to one individual, the actor themselves.
- to address the problems with utilitarianism, deontology builds off of it in making a set of rules that should be followed, and emphasizing obedience to these rules, so as to better serve the ratio, and this rule utilitarianism can be applied to a group of any size, including the one, so we can say that one should make a set of rules that one should apply to themselves to maximize their pleasure (and theirs alone) while minimizing their pain (and theirs alone).
- a self serving self centered selfish morality of the individual doing what most benefits themselves seeking to maximize their joy and minimize their misery over the long term is endorsed by thinkers who ponder their way to the core of ethics, realizing strategy is what makes such a view, called hedonism or egoism or illegalism or amoralism or radical individualism among other names, far different from the chaotic anarchic impulsive and possibly criminal vision most people have in mind when they encounter such ideas and envision what ought-to's may come of such a mentality (usually due to them feeling they must refute this idea out of social conditioning by society; fears about what this might be drive them to assume that it must be what they fear and that drives them to fight its potential influence rather than asking questions about what kinds of behaviors would actually come out of someone who abides by this anti-ethical amoral outlook)
- but we can go a step further to ask why things make us feel good and produce desires, and why other things make us feel bad and produce fears.
- the answer is evolution, and the selfish gene is perhaps the best explanation of why we have a sense of morality or a need to he ethical at all. Because it increased the likelihood of the genes in our ancestors increasing in number, being passed on to future generations and becoming more widespread and outlasting other genes they were in competition with them.
- so the true nature of morals and ethics are to enable us to propagate copies of genetics like our own as much as possible.
- from this we can conclude that racism is 100% ethical, and anti+racism is in fact unethical.
- morality is helping our genes to spread in proportion to other genes.
- I can go further and say that what is most important is increasing the number of genes that are recessive and beautiful, for what is beauty but the possession of the most desirable genes to a potential reproductive partner?
- hence why we should all do all we can to increase the percentage and number of humans who have pale or fair skin, blue or green eyes, and blonde or red hair.
- more in depth, we should increase the amount of humans with low levels if eumelanin, both in the number of such individuals, and in the ratio of them in comparison to humans who don't possess such features.
- also, we can discard God and religion, because a few steps ago we figured out what God and the afterlife truly are.
- back when we had a king, he could use the threat of force or deprivation to control his subjects and prevent them from refusing to cooperate/contribute/produce, or from breaking the rules/laws the king had established, or from rebellion or revolt against him. But when the king or his men couldn't detect every criminal they needed a way to control even those who couldn't be caught, so they invented a super-king who could see all and know all and who had such great power he could never be resisted, and those who obeyed him were rewarded with the best possible most desirable things, while those who disobeyed were punished with the worst most feared things, but only after death when whether or not the person received either could no longer be verified.
- and we also figured out where the first road of the eupythro dilemma went, back when we asked where Gods moral authority actually came from.>>8547