/x/ - Paranormal & Conspiracy

147IQ IS JUST SOME POINTLESS NOBHEAD VLADITAS!xh0bVzPhBw!!qvLmuxLGVm 26/09/24(Thu)05:59 No. 22176

File 179022238964.jpg - (455.17KB , 784x1168 , Soul devoured or motto accurate.jpg )

"This is a basic truth about humanity or human civilizations, and it will show why "da jews" aren't really "a conspiracy" but the result of a "cycle". It takes morals and ethics (at least among one's own people) for a race/civilization/country to build itself from the zero level and grow and reach a level where prosperity among them is the most common everyday reality for everyone in it. Ethics and morals are essential/unavoidable to truly "work together", "build together", and grow "together". Then when prosperity sets in and has been there long enough, a generation comes for whom morals and ethics aren't exactly "necessary", if a person "destroys" his/her neighbour they know for sure that their prosperity won't be affected and the overall prosperity that exists in their surroundings won't be affected either so they can still glean the "prosperous experiences and impulses" from their surroundings wherever they go [there's no need to build "together" and "grow together" anymore for which morals and ethics among a group are paramount]. Once the ethics and morals start being taken out, the race/civilization/country starts eating itself from the inside like a cancer and in the end either implodes or ends up being taken over by another race/civilization that's stronger than them and has more morals among themselves.

It takes many centuries for a civilization to reach "mostly prosperous" levels, and something like 7-8 centuries to reach the "top of the world" level. But once the fall of its morals begins it falls completely within 1-2 centuries.

Us Indians used to be at the "top of the world" level, but once the cancer of immorality started spreading among us due to our prosperity, the white race took over us and destroyed us completely within 2 centuries and reduced us to an almost zero level. Currently the white race is at the "top of the world" but its moral downfall has begun decades ago and it seems they'll be conquered and destroyed by the jews within a century and then the jewish race will be at the "top of the world". Once the jewish race has been prosperous for too long, they'll start losing their morals too and will either implode or be conquered by another people, and the cycle will continue! This is why "the jews" aren't exactly a "conspiracy", the British conquered us Indians using the same/similar "conspiracies". It just happens to be so that in our current times the jewish race is at the position to be at the very top, once their time is "over" due to their "internal moral corruptions", they'll fall and another race/civilization will take their place.

They don't say "History repeats itself" for no reason lol. It seems us hum"

The only way to spare civilisations effectively from such a cycle is to amend the problem not stand around gawking and pointing it out.

If you wish to be of benefit, perhaps ed your post with THEREFORE ETHICS>MORALS or else morals decay.

26/10/18(Sun)00:26 No. 22231

>>22176
>The only way to spare civilisations effectively from such a cycle is to amend the problem not stand around gawking and pointing it out.

The problem shown has the solution in its very description. Return to being an ethical and moral society and you'll be back on the path of growth and prosperity, but again, once "unprecedented prosperity" hits a civilization/country, all the talks about morality will again start seeming pointless to people because they're "already at the top of the world", but during the decline of a civilization the process can perhaps be reversed. But no one's gonna listen about morality during the time unprecedented prosperity exists, being moral is difficult and requires a lot of effort and time, and comparatively being immoral/evil doesn't require any effort or time, if people are made to realise that the effort and time required by morality is worth it, they can grow collectively and perpetually.

26/10/18(Sun)04:06 No. 22232

>>22176
>somtin somtin da jews somtin white race
tl;dr

>>22231
Wasn't going to post, but this is mostly wrong. Not being a prick takes suprisingly little effort, and most people when faced with an obvious ethical dilemma will make the obvious choice.
I don't believe that people stop listening to morality/ethics because of prosperity. I think that in current society people ignore them mostly because they aren't talked about. Lacking a framework for thought itself, we succumb to impulse and urges. Thus the collapse.
An overview of philosophy should be a required class in Jr High. imo. And for what it's worth.

26/10/28(Wed)15:45 No. 22235

>>22232
>I don't believe that people stop listening to morality/ethics because of prosperity.
Let's go to the extremes of the beginning of a particular race's civilization and come to prosperity step by step. In the beginning a race is just looking for ways to "survive together" as a group, and let's take the example of a very small group/tribe that has only 1 doctor and 2 hunters and 1 farmer. In such a case,the hunter has no choice but to give the doctor "the best he can", because if something happens to the doctor and he dies or is not in his right mind due to malnourishment or dies due to lack of food/shelter/etc., the hunter and his family are doomed, so the hunter just has to be the most moral/ethical towards the doctor or else his own survival will be in jeapordy. As the tribe starts getting more and more prosperous, more and more options become open to be immoral because then being moral towards people of their own tribe starts becoming less and less of "an unavoidable necessity", and once "unprecedented prosperity" hits a race, most of the people living in it can be immoral without losing their prosperity (and the prosperity they glean from their surroundings), the prosperity becomes "assured" for them during "their entire lifetime". The more the prosperity the lesser the need/necessity to be moral, and the more will be the people choosing to be immoral.

The jews didn't have a land they could call their "homeland" for the longest time, in fact perhaps at a point in time they were virtually the only race on earth without a homeland of their own. And this "lack of prosperity due to being homeless" forced them to be moral among themselves/their own group/their own race, and made them a more closely knit together group "working together" than others, and now they've ended up becoming the race that will dethrone the white race and will become the topmost race on earth. All those "morals" brewing within them due to the "necessity" imposed on them by their "homelessnessness" made them a greater force working together than others over the centuries. After a while, they will inevitably start becoming immoral among themselves too and some other race will take their place and the cycle will go on.

The position for "the topmost race on earth" is open for everyone, it's just that at different times different races become moral enough among themselves to take it.

26/10/28(Wed)17:54 No. 22236

>>22235
That's not how morals work. You don't be moral with those but immoral with some other ones. That's not morality.

26/10/29(Thu)10:41 No. 22237

>>22236
>That's not how morals work. You don't be moral with those but immoral with some other ones. That's not morality.
You're talking about "true morality" here, but such "selective morality" does work in this world even though "selective morality" will damn a person to hell. Even satanists are "selectively moral" among themselves and they do end up fulfilling their agendas, and terrorists who are "selectively moral" towards themselves end up outsmarting armies and intelligence agencies around the world.

If people want to "work together" and "grow together" morals (true or selective) are necessary, though "true morality" that is fully and equally moral towards everyone is the ultimate truth that very few reach (to others true morality just seems like "stupidity").

26/10/31(Sat)18:31 No. 22238

>>22235
>In the beginning...and once "unprecedented prosperity" hits a race
I'm not an anthropologist, but neither are you. I don't base my ideas of civilizational development on Age of Empires.
>the only race on earth without a homeland
Google the word "Nomad"
Also "White" isn't a race.
>topmost race on earth
Are you fucking twelve? Do you think that you can rank humanity from best to worst? Did you get that idea from a Rick and Morty episode? How fucking one dimensional is your thinking? Are you psychotic? Do you not know the real world?
wtf lol

26/10/31(Sat)21:30 No. 22239

>>22238
You're talking with an curryfag, my nigga

[Return] [Catalog] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]