-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/fit/ - Fitness & Health
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 233 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Official Requests Thread Anonymous ## Admin ## 18/08/11(Sat)21:13 No. 22341 [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts] Stickied
22341

File 153401479813.png - (619.18KB , 613x522 , 1527077363162.png )

All requests go in here. This thread will periodically be purged of old posts.


323 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 18/09/21(Fri)12:27 No. 23410

>>23369

Is there a file missing from Cressey's SSS? Vids are numbered, and #7 isn't there. TY.




FAQ Anonymous ## Mod ## 09/08/13(Thu)19:28 No. 2038 [Reply] Locked Stickied
2038

File 12501845171.jpg - (38.01KB , 566x848 , fit.jpg )

This is the /fit/ FAQ. You should read it.

It contains a fuckton of incredibly useful information for anyone seeking to improve their physical fitness.

If you post a question which has already been answered in this FAQ, don't be surprised if you find your post mocked, saged, or missing.

It's here for a reason.

Credit belongs to ZigCat for the original FAQ, with small amendments by /fit/ as a whole. RIP ZC.


17 posts and 17 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous ## Mod ## 09/08/13(Thu)20:39 No. 2062

IRC
For general and fitness-related chat. No being retarded, it's not /b/.

Server: irc.7chan.org port: 6667
/join #/fit/




Science backed training advice getting boring? L1ft1ng!!R4BQVmBQH4 18/09/01(Sat)11:30 No. 23011 [Reply]
23011

File 153579420526.jpg - (174.69KB , 1038x731 , proxy_duckduckgo_com.jpg )

Are the science backed fitness guys getting boring?

Schoenfeld, Helms, Israetel and their add on people like Steve Hall, all spouting science backed training advice.

Study after study comes out and they all have their own videos on it, but there is nothing new about how to train that hasn't been said over and over again.

Thoughts?


7 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 18/09/17(Mon)01:51 No. 23330


>>
JCX!bB6vC9u.Vc 18/09/17(Mon)03:06 No. 23332

>>23325
It's kinda simple in reality. More volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and for increasing the time that occurs every time before approaching the overreaching state, before having to take a deload).

That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever), even in the last "45 sets to failure x week for quads" study! BUT if it isn't the same for you, then all you are doing is losing time doing junk volume, overreaching sooner and increasing injury risk tenfolds. If those subjects didn't manage to increase their strength, i can bet they would not realize that much hypertrophy, probably lot of edema, intracellular water, increased glycogen storages, etc.. (sarcoplasmic hypertrophy we could call it).

In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible, there is no fucking need to study it again, and all the inter variability in muscle hypertrophy response during these such studies demonstrated this very clearly.


>>
L1ft1ng!!R4BQVmBQH4 18/09/17(Mon)11:51 No. 23337

>>23332

>In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach.

> there is no fucking need to study it again

I think we're on the same page here.

Who the hell has time for 45 sets per week?




Anonymous 18/08/13(Mon)13:34 No. 22425 [Reply]
22425

File 153416005168.jpg - (1.13MB , 2340x4160 , 20170409_165039_HDR.jpg )

i'm 22 but have the skin of a 32 year old how do i fix that?


2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 18/08/20(Mon)20:58 No. 22739

Quit chainsmoking drinking and posting on /fit/


>>
Anonymous 18/08/27(Mon)23:27 No. 22861

dermarolling


>>
Anonymous 18/09/12(Wed)04:01 No. 23238

You are still being a little too vague to get a good answer. Post photos both here and on /r/skincareaddiction




Lyme Disease Treatment Josh 18/09/02(Sun)22:51 No. 23033 [Reply]
23033

File 153592147368.jpg - (126.32KB , 1600x900 , tickssd.jpg )

Good Afternoon Everyone.
As indicated by the title, I did in fact contract lyme disease close to 2 months ago. I have been on two separate antibiotics for the treatment of this ailment thus far and I am coming to the end of the second prescribed dosage. I was wondering if it is common for symptoms of lyme disease to persist after completing a dosage for a short period of time before it's completely gone. Thank you.




Anonymous 18/03/31(Sat)20:38 No. 20692 [Reply]
20692

File 15225215212.png - (58.91KB , 288x226 , thenx.png )

No homo but this guy has pretty fucking nice body

also thread about thenx what do you think about him and calesthenics


>>
sciencebro 18/05/03(Thu)07:46 No. 21079

pretty sure you are a homo


>>
Anonymous 18/06/12(Tue)20:08 No. 21730

>>21079
Well he is on /fit/




Official Request Thread Gone? L1ft1ng 18/08/11(Sat)21:03 No. 22339 [Reply]
22339

File 153401421618.png - (117.96KB , 418x514 , wk3.png )

What's happened to the official request thread please?


>>
Anonymous ## Admin ## 18/08/11(Sat)21:09 No. 22340

>>22339
I accidentally nuked it while cleaning it; Script didn't have an exception for the OP.

I'll start a new one momentarily.


>>
L1ft1ng 18/08/11(Sat)21:15 No. 22342

>>22340

Ah cheers for letting us know, glad we're allowed to still share stuff.




Anonymous 18/01/13(Sat)08:55 No. 20173 [Reply]
20173

File 151583014456.jpg - (30.08KB , 500x375 , 826b500249ca1a58e10af6c0b8a84aec5ba96e42127bd30be1.jpg )

What's the best way to lose weight with minimal exercise? I just really don't want muscle to be honest. I want to get back to being a thin twig. So I can wear my tight clothes again. I'm 155 wanting to get back down to about 115 - 120. Also I'm 5'5" if that information is useful.


5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 18/04/20(Fri)05:22 No. 20883

>>20882
You can calucate TDEE here, or any of dozens of other places online.

http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.html


>>
sage Anonymous 18/05/02(Wed)20:06 No. 21073

no simple carbs


>>
Anonymous 18/08/11(Sat)05:31 No. 22320

>120# at 5'5"
T hats like auschwicz thin for a male




Skinny Fat Problem Anon 18/07/13(Fri)23:57 No. 21993 [Reply]
21993

File 153151907599.jpg - (800.90KB , 1374x4032 , IMG_20180714_010025.jpg )

I started fitness 2 months ago. When i start i was 72kg and now i'm 69 kg. My body fat is too. It's approximately %20. I need to decrease that. My TDEE 2500 so i deficit that and make 2000 calorie. I also take my macros as posssible as i can. First 1.5 month i tried full body workout 3x12 but i can't progressive overload weights. So i changed program and started StrongLifts 5x5. Should i continue it or change it? I think i need to firstly fat loss but how. Is it good?


>>
#2 Anon 18/07/13(Fri)23:59 No. 21994
21994

File 153151916662.jpg - (1.25MB , 4032x3016 , IMG_20180714_005858_HHT.jpg )


>>
Anonymous 18/08/04(Sat)15:54 No. 22252

Your body fat is not that high, but your lack of muscle makes it look flabby. You have nothing to cut back to, so consider bulking VERY slowly and build a solid foundation of strength (what a your lifts, btw?). Keep doing 5x5 for a couple of months, but then I recommend changing to PHUL, since it has more volume. Also, if in that state you're having problems overloading you're either not eating right, undersleeping or your form is shit. At beginner stage your lifts should be going up in the 4-6 rep range pretty quickly.


>>
Anonymous 18/08/11(Sat)05:27 No. 22319

Yohimbine HCL and a diet like leangains would have an effect. You can always check out their subreddit.




No Equipment Exercise Programs Pacer 18/03/04(Sun)10:56 No. 20516 [Reply]
20516

File 152015739978.jpg - (65.99KB , 736x491 , calisthenics-benefits-6.jpg )

I'm being moved by my work for six months to an area that has no gym or exercise equipment. My luggage is limited, but I have a bar thing that I can hook into a doorframe for pull/chin ups that I'm taking with.

Is there a decent calisthenics program that I can follow that will help me continue building strength/muscle?


1 post and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 18/04/20(Fri)03:54 No. 20879
20879

File 152418924437.jpg - (2.75MB , 3773x4000 , 1411629298580.jpg )

>>20878 cont.

To actually answer your question, I'm a fan of Convict Conditioning, although I'd add inverted rows to the program. I also like all of Al Kavadlo's work, but most programs will be fine as long as you keep in mind progressive overload.

The basic idea is to try to find a decent balance of exercises and increase the weight you're pushing/pulling by moving to harder variations and, where appropriate, moving from two-handed/legged exercises to one-handed/legged exercises.

There are basically two things to avoid if you're working for strength:

One is endurance focused programs. It doesn't matter how many pushups you can do in a row, your strength won't increase after about 3x20, maybe even before that. You have to move to a harder variation. More specifically, you have to move to a variation that involves pushing a higher percentage of your bodyweight or concentrating that bodyweight on a smaller number of muscles (I.e., working to one-arm pushups with elevated feet).

The other is programs that focus too much on gymnastic skills. Reddit's recommended routine is fine, for example, but its focus involves more gymnastic skills than the ones I mentioned. Those skills are super cool and benefit your over-all athleticism and ability to avoid injury, but anything that isn't going to increase the amount of weight you're moving isn't going to help increase strength or hypertrophy. /r/bodyweight's sacred text, Overcoming Gravity, is a great resource, but there's a reason it puts "gymnastics" before "strength," in the subtitle, and it's the same reason the author, Steven Low, looks the way he does despite being able to perform some impressive feats of gymnastic skill and athleticism.

As an example, ring dips are harder than parallel bar dips for most people, but the added difficulty comes from stabilization and coordination, not from pushing more weight. Also, silly things like one-finger pushups are pretty much just gimmicks.

You can try to master both the gymnastic skills and the strength work, but most people end up choosing which is more important to them and neglecting the other--some gymnastic skills are pretty much impossible if you're too swole.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


>>
Anonymous 18/04/20(Fri)04:01 No. 20880

>>20879
One last thing about Convict Conditioning: There are more incremental progressions than anyone actually needs. Start with the hardest one you can do safely and feel free to skip some of the progressions that are just minor variations. Also, the progression standards are way too many reps. 3x8-12 is fine.

Basically, this is all just stuff you already know if you've been lifting. It's just that there are a surprisingly large number of lifters who think that muscles suddenly work differently when they're lifting your own body.


>>
athlean xero TheTrapLord 18/08/10(Fri)15:31 No. 22310
22310

File 15339078703.jpg - (17.18KB , 718x698 , athlean x.jpg )

Complete bodyweight programs:

Buff Dudes Bodyweight Program
Athlean Xero
Athlean X Bodyweight Series on Youtube




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason